Your team wants to use AI. What needs to be in place first?
Maritime AI Readiness Pack · When a first AI trial needs management approval
Someone has tried it. The draft looks useful. The next question is whether the business is ready to let that become normal work.
Who owns the task? What information may go in? Who checks the output? What would make you stop?
The Maritime AI Readiness Pack helps you turn those questions into a defined first use case. It combines assessment, policy, risk and review materials so you can work through the decision with something more concrete than a promising demonstration.
Start with one task you can explain
Illustrative example, created for this page.
Your team wants AI to draft the structure of a safety briefing. Define the permitted input as generic, approved material. Name the person who will check the output. Record the corrections needed before use, then review whether the task is worth continuing.
That gives management a specific decision: continue with the controls, change the task or stop the trial. It also gives you a sensible place to start applying the pack.
Bring the work around that decision together
Choose the opportunity. Use the readiness evaluation, checklist and opportunity map to examine where AI might fit and what needs attention first.
Set the working conditions. Adapt the policy, risk and implementation records to establish ownership and the intended approach.
Keep evidence of use and review. Use the logs, review records and dashboard to bring activity and decisions together for management discussion.
What is in the supplied pack?
The supplied pack contains 23 files: nine PDFs, nine Word documents and five spreadsheets. Some formats represent the same resource; this is a mixed-format working pack, not 23 unrelated tools.
- Readiness evaluation, checklist and opportunity map.
- Policy, risk register and starter implementation worksheet.
- Usage log, output-review record and governance dashboard.
- Management decision, provider due-diligence and reviewer records.
- Change/deviation log, governance cross-reference and worked example.
The pilot-feedback sheet is separate. Purchase and use rights are governed by the terms shown with the offer; the file count is not a promise of an additional final licence document.
See how the records fit together
The worked example follows one fictional use through the review process, summarised across 30 days. Use it to understand the connections between records; it is not a month of populated operating activity.
The dashboard calculates weekly and monthly summaries after you copy records into it. You control what goes in; it does not automatically collect data from the other workbooks.
Do we also need the 30-day bundle?
The Readiness Pack already includes implementation and review materials. Start here if your main question is whether and how to begin. Compare the dedicated 30-day plan only if you want its particular trial schedule and reporting sequence. There is overlap, so buying both is not the default recommendation.
Give your first AI use case a defined starting point
Explore the pack, check the current offer and choose the records you need for that first decision.
A short brief to share internally
Copy and adapt this for your manager or colleague:
We need to define one AI use case, its owner, permitted inputs and reviewer. The Readiness Pack supplies assessment and working records, with a fictional example showing how they connect. I propose we assess one task and review the controls before expanding use.
Choose the next resource for your task
- AI Hallucinations Guide & Verification Toolkit — Already producing AI drafts? Add a focused method for checking claims before sign-off.
- Maritime AI Audit Preparation Toolkit — Need to organise evidence across an audit? Explore five editable preparation and review workbooks.
- What Maritime QHSE Teams Should Never Paste Into AI Tools — Want an individual starting point? Get the free guide to reviewing proposed AI inputs.
Before you order
The shop shows the current price, edition and use terms. These materials support preparation and human review; they do not provide certification or guarantee an audit or inspection result.